o-level or matric

Image result for o'level vs matric                          Difference between O Levels and Matriculation System

Educational System

One of the major differences is that Matric system education is a local framework of the country, whereas O Levels is a British educational system. CIE (Cambridge International Education) UK conducts O Levels examinations all over the world and this system is globally recognized. On the other hand, secondary school education examinations are held by the Secondary and Higher Education Board of Pakistan.

Syllabus and Quality of Education

Another noteworthy difference between the two systems is the level of education. O levels syllabus is comprehensive and concept -based. The courses are tough, quality standards are high and students are prepared for the practical world. Whereas, the matric syllabus is the same as it was years ago, courses haven’t been changed since long and the examination system focuses on rote learning rather than concept building.

Monthly and Examination Fee

O levels, being a UK based system, is expensive as compared to the local educational system of Pakistan. The examination and monthly fee of O level education is pretty high as it costs approximately £65 per subject, totaling to £500 for all subjects. Thus, due to financial constraints, it becomes difficult for a middle class student to opt for O levels.

Grading Systems

The grading system is also completely different. Grades from A+ to E, are awarded in O levels, and students who’ve been unable to make it through are awarded with a U grade. Whereas, the grading in matriculation system is still based on the outdated system of numbers and percentages.

Examination Dates

Under O level framework, exams are held biannually, once in May/June and in November/December. Thus, students with a low passing grade can improve their grade within the span of six months. Matriculation examinations are held once a year, thus a student has to wait for one whole year to appear in supplementary examinations and improve his grade.

Examination Pattern

CIE aims to build logical thinking, problem solving and practical skills in students, thus there are 2 to 3 papers of a single subject. Whereas, matriculation students take a single exam per subject.
The medium of examinations in O levels is only English, whereas in the matriculation system, students can opt for taking their exams in Urdu language. Thus, an O level student is well versed in English which helps him in future.

The Final Verdict

There’s no doubt that the O level system of education is much better as compared to the matriculation system; however, financial restrictions is a major reason why majority of students opt for the local educational framework.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Stephen Hawking's Final Theory About Our Universe Has Just Been Published, And It Will Melt Your Brain MICHELLE STARR2 MAY 2018 Groundbreaking physicist Stephen Hawking left us one last shimmering piece of brilliance before he died: his final paper, detailing his last theory on the origin of the Universe, co-authored with Thomas Hertog from KU Leuven. The paper, published today in the Journal of High Energy Physics, puts forward that the Universe is far less complex than current multiverse theories suggest. It's based around a concept called eternal inflation, first introduced in 1979 and published in 1981. After the Big Bang, the Universe experienced a period of exponential inflation. Then it slowed down, and the energy converted into matter and radiation. However, according to the theory of eternal inflation, some bubbles of space stopped inflating or slowed on a stopping trajectory, creating a small fractal dead-end of static space. Meanwhile, in other bubbles of space, because of quantum effects, inflation never stops - leading to an infinite number of multiverses. Everything we see in our observable Universe, according to this theory, is contained in just one of these bubbles - in which inflation has stopped, allowing for the formation of stars and galaxies. multiverse inflating Visualisation of the inflating multiverse. (A. Linde/Stanford University) "The usual theory of eternal inflation predicts that globally our universe is like an infinite fractal, with a mosaic of different pocket universes, separated by an inflating ocean," Hawking explained. "The local laws of physics and chemistry can differ from one pocket universe to another, which together would form a multiverse. But I have never been a fan of the multiverse. If the scale of different universes in the multiverse is large or infinite the theory can't be tested." Even one of the original architects of the eternal inflation model has disavowed it in recent years. Paul Steinhardt, physicist at Princeton University, has gone on record saying that the theory took the problem it was meant to solve - to make the Universe, well, universally consistent with our observations - and just shifted it onto a new model. Hawking and Hertog are now saying that the eternal inflation model is wrong. This is because Einstein's theory of general relativity breaks down on quantum scales. "The problem with the usual account of eternal inflation is that it assumes an existing background universe that evolves according to Einstein's theory of general relativity and treats the quantum effects as small fluctuations around this," Hertog explained. "However, the dynamics of eternal inflation wipes out the separation between classical and quantum physics. As a consequence, Einstein's theory breaks down in eternal inflation." The new theory is based on string theory, one of the frameworks that attempts to reconcile general relativity with quantum theory by replacing the point-like particles in particle physics with tiny, vibrating one-dimensional strings. In string theory, the holographic principle proposes that a volume of space can be described on a lower-dimensional boundary; so the universe is like a hologram, in which physical reality in 3D spaces can be mathematically reduced to 2D projections on their surfaces. The researchers developed a variation of the holographic principle that projects the time dimension in eternal inflation, which allowed them to describe the concept without having to rely on general relativity. This then allowed them to mathematically reduce eternal inflation to a timeless state on a spatial surface at the beginning of the Universe - a hologram of eternal inflation. "When we trace the evolution of our universe backwards in time, at some point we arrive at the threshold of eternal inflation, where our familiar notion of time ceases to have any meaning," said Hertog. In 1983, Hawking and another researcher, physicist James Hartle, proposed what is known as the 'no boundary theory' or the 'Hartle-Hawking state'. They proposed that, prior to the Big Bang, there was space, but no time. So the Universe, when it began, expanded from a single point, but doesn't have a boundary.

10 EASY WAY TO EARN 100$ PER MONTH

PREDICTION DONE BY SIMPSON CARTOON CAME TO BE REAL